RC Stadium 1

10 comments on “RC Stadium 1”

1. A good track, it is very easy and it is clear where you need to steer, well done Xarc.

   1

2. Very good track and setting, ideal for those who like a good race. The only thing that would change would be the starting position, because the cars are not able to go up the bridge, and they all stay down there.
   However, I applaud the creator for such a magnificent job creating this track.

   0

3. @tropical bird

   When your only form of argument is to just disparage the other side without even listening(well reading here, obviously) to what they have to say, you’re not doing yourself any favors.

   Don’t just blindly say, uh.. “I can‘t belive people have no other problems then complaining about stuff like this”. That.

   If you’re having a bad day before you go to type that you disagree with something, maybe take a moment and just breath, think about what you’re trying to actually argue and then say your side of it. For instance, that quote above right out the gate doesn’t really make much sense, because I’m going to assume I was one of these belived peoples you’re talking about, and I both stated right out the gate politely that there were aspects of the track that I personally was not a fan of, and then when I DID state I had an issue with the naming, I did so politely whilst also agreeing that it was ultimately the call of Xarc.

   Hell, 607 wasn’t really overly rude or anything in their wording either, so if you’re concept is being disrespectful or blaming is someone openly disagreeing with your views, then I don’t know why I’m bothering to even try to point all of this out.

   Anyway, to Xarc, I apologize for playing a part in turning this comment section into, well, whatever is going on down here. And also if you feel offended or disrespected on a personal level. I still believe what I said, but it was in no way my goal to actually upset anyone.

   1

4. Re: The naming discussion / deletion of the original tracks:

   I think it‘s the right of the creator to decide what to do. I fully understand why Xarc did it that way, and I think it‘s very disrespectful to blaim him for this decision. I can‘t belive people have no other problems then complaining about stuff like this.

   1

5. Great work as always. Even if it’s thematically not a track I’m much interested, it’s at least a treat to drive on, and the quality and care that has gone into it is fairly obvious.

   Music choice was a bit weak, and it looks like you did default it back to a redbook track, which was wise imo.

   Other then that the only thing I’d say is that I have to agree with 607 on the naming thing, at least with the newer Stadium 1. I have never raced on the originals, but if the new RS1 and the old RS1 deviate heavily from one-another, it might of been a good idea to just name this one RC Stadium 3/Remix/Revamp/Neo/The One She Tells You Not to Worry About/Whatever. Ultimately your call obviously, but I can understand why this might cause some concern, especially in a community that treasures their legacy content so much.

   Again though, very nicely done overall.

   0

6. @607 the old tracks weren’t purged by staff members, I asked for deletion myself, I decided to remake them from scratch because i was not happy with the old ones, rc stadium 1 was just a low poly oversized oval really nothing special, this is why i changed the raceline to something more interesting, rc stadium 2 on the other hand features a very similar raceline, i did my best to make it faithful to the original. That being said, it was my choice to do this because it makes me happy to improve my old creations and i think i have the right to do it if i want

   2

7. This is completely different than it was before. Different modelling, different track layout, different textures… it is really an entirely different track. I think you ought to have called these RC Stadium 3 and 4. Attempting to remove tracks from other people’s creations (people might say ‘Yes’ to overwrite without realising what’s going on) is bad practice, in my opinion. Why hide your past? Let people see how you’ve improved (although in my opinion the original tracks aren’t bad either).
   Edit: And people removing the originals accidentally isn’t the only issue; this way it is very hard to have both tracks in your installation; you are requiring the player to rename the files. I frankly don’t get why RVW allows a new track with the same folder name.

   0

8. I love RC circuit tracks for their ability to represent circuit tracks without breaking the immersion of driving an RC car. This and RC Stadium 2 are no exception. The layout is smooth and fast-paced, with cars gliding through each corner like they’re nothing; its atmosphere, vibrant and colorful. There’s not a single spot in the track that doesn’t have striking colors.

   This is my favorite track of its kind. Amazing work, Xarc!

   1

9. I like this track slightly more than the RC Stadium 2 one. The overall quality is equal, but personally I like the outdoor location more – maybe because it feels more realistic. For me the raceline has the same issues as I stated in my RC Stadium 2 comment, but other than that it’s a high quality track which every RC car fan should own. :)

   @Hector: Maybe you confuse this track with the RC Stadium 2 one? On this track there are mostly tarmac surfaces (except the shortcut where the star is located), so it make more sense to use onroad vehicles here. Or maybe you mean because of the up- and down parts? But… it doesn’t matter anway. It’s a fun track for both on- and offroad cars. :)

   1

10. Really enjoyed the track for off road vehicles good track xarc

    0